Google Analytics throws lots of metrics your way. If you're looking at how engaged your users are, it's easy to latch on to average engagement time per active user. It's the first number in the Engagement Report, after all.
Is it a good metric to track? Or is it prone to distortion?
Imagine you have a content website - like BBC News - and you provide stories for your audience. If your content is good they will read more, would you agree? And if it's boring, or confusing, or broken, they will spend less time there, right?
That's a good general rule.
Let me give a caveat. Imagine your aim is for someone to understand your message. That might be an aim for a public service website, like the NHS portal in the UK, or a local council website such as Liverpool City Council. A long-winded, badly-worded page would hinder that goal. Confusingly, a long-winded, badly-worded page might also have a longer average engagement time in Google Analytics (GA).
Imagine you work for a cancer charity and you're trying to raise money. You run an email marketing campaign. The emails lead supporters through to a particular website page to give money. But imagine that the donation form is actually stored on a different website such as the Charities Aid Foundation.
In this context success is measured in the number and quantity of donations. That money helps the charity invest in cancer research, and provide support to those affected.
These would be the steps in the user journey:
- Information page on website
- Donation page on CAF Bank website
- Receipt and thank you page on CAF Bank website
- Thank you email
About me
I'm James, a Google Analytics consultant in the UK.
I can help you make the most of Google Analytics.
